Car Companies "Blocking" Alternative Fuels?

Discuss Anything & Everything Tucker

Moderators: Tuckerfan1053, TuckerCar, Phantomrig

Forum rules
The views expressed by users of this forum are their own and do not reflect the position of the Tucker Automobile Club of America, Inc., its members, officers or directors. Each user is responsible for the content of his/her own posts.

By utilizing these boards you are agreeing to these terms and agree to hold harmless Tucker Automobile Club of America, Inc. and its members, officers or directors from any part in the outcome of your use of these boards.

The Tucker Automobile Club of America, Inc. reserves the right to delete, edit or otherwise modify posts as it deems necessary for the organization or primary purpose of the site. Please report any activity which is libelous, inflammatory, or in violation of common decency to the forum administrator immediately.

Car Companies "Blocking" Alternative Fuels?

Postby Tuckerfan1053 » Sun Jan 29, 2006 3:18 am

One expert thinks so.
But Professor Blythe, who is one of the key contributors to the government future transport strategy, claimed it was the manufacturers who were dragging their feet.

"We have had a lot of meetings with car companies, who promote their green credentials - but they say we are not going to do much for the next 20 to 30 years because our customers don't want to pay more.

"Japanese car manufacturers seem to be much more progressive than some of the European or American ones," he said.
Not quite shades of the fabled "100 MPG carb," but not a good side (and from what I've read elsewhere, pretty accurate).

Of course, promising automotive technology has been "squashed" by the government in the past.
Chrysler got some loans from the US Government...that much is certain. That Chrysler (as a condition of those loans) had to sell off Chrysler Defense and the M1 turbine-powered tank program is somewhat lesser known, but still public knowledge.

What is known only to a priveleged few is that the government killed a dream of a lifetime for a group of 70 people at the Chrysler "skunkworks" in Highland Park.

Believe it or not, Chrysler was days away from making a production decision (one which Iacocca favored) on a rather unique vehicle....

1981 Chrysler New Yorker Turbine car (M-body)... the car was ready to be tooled according to the head of the program, Mr. George Scheckter, whom I met when I got to see and touch the 1963 Turbine Car again in 1989. There was no more design work to be accomplished, just tool and start production.

The Turbine Engine was a fifth generation (not a 3rd generation like the 1963 car) engine capable of 22mpg in the EPA test cycles. To really make this sink in, one of the prototypes is still in existence (at least it was in 1989), stored in the same building as the 1963 car, its tooling and all the remaining spare parts (enough to build 3 more of the '63 cars).

Your government thought it was too much of a risk and ordered the car cancelled as "too risky, from an economic standpoint." Just imagine what COULD have happened!
(emphasis in original)

The nice thing about turbines is that they can run on anything liquid and flammable. I'd be remiss if I didn't point out that Preston Tucker was researching turbine powered cars when he got shut down.
User avatar
Tuckerfan1053
Moderator
 
Posts: 622
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 1:00 am
Location: Gallatin, TN

Return to Tucker Topics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest